|
IARC was formed in
1999
It provides an
opportunity for post secondary educational bodies to
demonstrate credibility.
It does not
guarantee any sort of acceptance by any particular country or
government; but it does provide a solid endorsement from all member
institutions, of other member institutions.
Historically less
than 40% of recognition applications have ever been successful. We
believe this in itself is an indication of the success of IARC in
differentiating quality education.
It is different to
other accreditation and recognition systems in a number of
ways:
Recognised institutions are audited to
ensure minimum standards are met with equal importance given to both
procedures, and quality of the education being provided (In our
experience some systems have become are weighted more toward
procedures).
Standards are set by:
education professionals
member institutions
people from many different countries.
Other accreditation
and recognition systems (commonly) set standards in just one
country, and by governments or professional industry
bodies.
This organization is kept lean.
Bureaucracy and unnecessary costs are avoided
wherever possible Costs to recognized member organizations are
kept to a minimum (while maintaining standards) This makes IARC
recognition more accessible to institutions from poorer countries
than other costly systems run within wealthy countries This
reduces costs imposed on colleges, so a much lower % of the colleges
budget needs to go toward recognition. This contrasts
with some systems that have been claimed to drain 25% or more of a
college's budget (and students fees) into dealing with recognition
bureaucracy. |